Congressman Still Has Privacy Concerns About Kindle Fire’s Browser - whatleyephimagent
Silk, the Web browser Amazon bundles with its Kindle Fire tab, has been a burr in the root of US Emblematic Ed Markey since the world's largest retail merchant proclaimed information technology in October. And a letter from Amazon River to the Massachusetts Populist hasn't salved his privacy concerns about the browser.
Amazon's missive was in response to a series of questions posed to the ship's company past Markey about data and secrecy issues associated with Silk. For example, Markey asked what information Amazon is collecting from Fire users.
Paul Misener, Amazon River's vice president for global public policy, told Markey that the company collects aggregate browsing information from Fire users. The Web address, or URL, of every page served up to the web browser is temporarily stored by Amazon for 30 days, but no associations are made between the URLs and individual users. "This information is a key factor in driving Amazon Silk's velocity," Misener wrote in the letter.
In addition, some webpage information is cached away Amazon's servers, he explained. Caching selective information allows a browser to load webpages quicker. That practice is similar to what's done by some web browser running on a computer, except those browsers store cache items locally instead of in the mottle.
Misener added that Amazon too stores information from "break apart reports." Those reports are generated when something goes amiss with Silk; the reports are used to troubleshoot problems. Those reports can contain taxon IP or MAC addresses and although Misener didn't mention information technology in his letter of the alphabet, those addresses could be used to identify individual users.
An issue cleared upfield by Misener is what happens when Silk communicates with secure, or SSL, webpages, so much as those used away a bank operating theatre PayPal. Those requests, he wrote, go directly to the origin servers and do not carry out Amazon servers.
Markey also wanted to know what Amazon River intends to do with the selective information it gathers. "Customer entropy is an life-and-death part of our business and an important driver of client experience and coming invention," Misener wrote. "We do not deal out (or rent) the selective information to others and do not have plans to act up so."
Another Markey concern is whether Silk users arse choose out of share-out their browsing habits with Amazon. Although Misener didn't answer that question directly, he did note that turning turned Silk's cloud quickening feature volition prevent browsing data from being stored along Amazon's servers.
Markey said He was dissatisfied with Amazon's response to his queries and would be seeking more information from the companionship. "Amazon's responses to my inquiries answer non provide enough detail about how the company intends to use customer information, beyond acknowledging that the company uses this blue-chip information," he said in a statement.
Markey ISN't the only phallus of Congress critical of Silk. Texas Political party Joe Barton has also overt outrage at the browser's caching of information on its users' Internet surfing habits.
Follow mercenary applied science writer St. John P. Mello Jr. and Today@PCWorld on Twitter.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/472486/congressman_still_has_privacy_concerns_about_kindle_fires_browser.html
Posted by: whatleyephimagent.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Congressman Still Has Privacy Concerns About Kindle Fire’s Browser - whatleyephimagent"
Post a Comment